Michael Kinsley on the future of newspapers in The Washington Post and in Slate (nice to see the two sites sharing content, now that The Post owns Slate:
Michael Kinsley on the future of newspapers in The Washington Post and in Slate (nice to see the two sites sharing content, now that The Post owns Slate:
The trouble even an established customer will take to obtain a newspaper continues to shrink, as well. Once, I would drive across town if necessary. Today, I open the front door and if the paper isn’t within about 10 feet I retreat to my computer and read it online. Only six months ago, that figure was 20 feet. Extrapolating, they will have to bring it to me in bed by the end of the year and read it to me out loud by the second quarter of 2007.
No one knows how all this will play out. But it is hard to believe that there will be room in the economy for delivering news by the Rube Goldberg process described above. That doesn’t mean newspapers are toast. After all, they’ve got the brand names. You gotta trust something called the “Post-Intelligencer” more than something called “Yahoo” or “Google,” don’t you? No, seriously, don’t you? Okay, how old did you say you are?
Black and white and dead all over
Michael Kinsley on the future of newspapers in The Washington Post and in Slate (nice to see the two sites sharing content, now that The Post owns Slate:
Michael Kinsley on the future of newspapers in The Washington Post and in Slate (nice to see the two sites sharing content, now that The Post owns Slate:
Filed Under: Essays and Commentary