Can you trust Wikipedia?
December 4, 2005 · · 1 Comment
The debate over the reliability of Wikipedia has been renewed, after John Seigenthaler Sr., a former editor of The Tennessean in Nashville, read in his biography on Wikipedia that he “was thought to have been directly involved in the Kennedy assassinations of both John and his brother Bobby.”
The debate over the reliability of Wikipedia has been renewed, after John Seigenthaler Sr., a former editor of The Tennessean in Nashville, read in his biography on Wikipedia that he “was thought to have been directly involved in the Kennedy assassinations of both John and his brother Bobby.”
He wrote an op-ed in USA Today criticizing Wikipedia last week.
Mr. Seigenthaler, after discovering that he had been defamed, found that his “biographer” was anonymous. He learned that the writer was a customer of BellSouth Internet, but that federal privacy laws shield the identity of Internet customers, even if they disseminate defamatory material. And the laws protect online corporations from libel suits.
He could have filed a lawsuit against BellSouth, he wrote, but only a subpoena would compel BellSouth to reveal the name.
In the end, Mr. Seigenthaler decided against going to court, instead alerting the public, through his article, “that Wikipedia is a flawed and irresponsible research tool.”
Related: Internet IQ Checklist for Journalists
Comments
One Response to “Can you trust Wikipedia?”
Got something to say?
Seems to me Mr.Seigenthaler could simply have changed the false information. Wickipedia is open to editing, after all. And then he could have found the clown who wrote that and introduced him to a left hook and right jab.