Ruling in Apple case bolsters Web reporters
A California appeals court has ruled that online reporters are protected by the same confidentiality laws that protect traditional journalists, The New York Times reports.
Apple had argued that Web sites publishing reports about Apple were not engaged in legitimate news gathering but were misappropriating trade secrets and violating copyrights. But the appellate panel disagreed, saying that online and off-line journalists were equally protected under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
"We can think of no workable test or principle that would distinguish 'legitimate' from 'illegitimate' news," the opinion states. "Any attempt by courts to draw such a distinction would imperil a fundamental purpose of the First Amendment.... Beyond casting aspersions on the legitimacy of petitioners' enterprise, Apple offers no cogent reason to conclude that they fall outside the shield law's protection."
The ruling states that Web sites are covered by California's shield law protecting the confidentiality of journalists' sources.
If upheld, the ruling could have a far- reaching impact in California courts on other writers who publish electronically, including bloggers who regularly post news and opinion online without the backing of a mainstream news operation.
"This ruling will probably prove instructive to other online writers," said Kurt Opsahl, a lawyer with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a civil liberties organization, who argued the case in front of the appeals court last month. "It says that what makes a journalist is not the format but the function."
May 28, 2006 | E-MAIL | SAVE | PRINT | PERMALINK | DISCUSS(0)
Discussion
0 comments about 'Ruling in Apple case bolsters Web reporters'Post a comment
Site Map
